ライフデザイン

経済レポート

「東日本大震災による被害・生活環境・復興に関するアンケート」2020年調査結果概要-福島県双葉町民を対象とした第6回調査

■要旨 「東日本大震災による被害・生活環境・復興に関するアンケート」調査は、東京大学「災害からの生活基盤復興に関する国際比較」プロジェクト(東京大学大学院経済学研究科 教授 澤田康幸、ニッセイ基礎研究所 准主任研究員 岩﨑敬子)によって、東日本大震災による原子力発電所の事故で全町民が避難を余儀なくされた福島県双葉町の全世帯主の皆様を対象に2013年から行われてきた調査である(過去実施:2013年7月、2014年12月、2016年7月、2017年12月、2019...

経済レポート

Damage, Living Environment, and Reconstruction under the Great East Japan Earthquake-The 6th Survey of Nuclear Disaster Evacuees from Futaba, Fukushima, Summary of Results 2020 

■Summary

Surveys on damage, living environment and reconstruction under the Great East Japan Earthquake have been conducted by a research project, "International comparison of reconstruction of living infrastructure from disasters" (Yasuyuki Sawada, Professor, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo; Keiko Iwasaki, Researcher, NLI Research Institute) of the University of Tokyo since 2013. The surveys are targeted to all household heads of Futaba in Fukushima prefecture, where all residents were forced to evacuate due to the nuclear power plant accident caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake ooccured in 2011. Surveys were conducted in July 2013, December 2014, July 2016, December 2017, July 2019 and December 2020. This paper reports the summary of results of the sixth survey conducted in December 2020.

■Index

1――Basic Information
2――Health conditions
3――Change in social capital
4――Building relationship with residents at evacuation desitinations
5――Summary of the findings from the five rounds of surveysSurveys on damage, living environment and reconstruction under the Great East Japan Earthquake have been conducted by a research project, "International comparison of reconstruction of living infrastructure from disasters" (Yasuyuki Sawada, Professor, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo; Keiko Iwasaki, Researcher, NLI Research Institute) of the University of Tokyo since 2013. The surveys are targeted to all household heads of Futaba in Fukushima prefecture, where all residents were forced to evacuate due to the nuclear power plant accident caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake ooccured in 2011. Surveys were conducted in July 2013, December 2014, July 2016, December 2017, July 2019 and December 2020. This paper reports the summary of results of the sixth survey conducted in December 2020.1The survey include questions about basic attributes such as age and sex, as well as quetions related to connections with others (social capital) and health conditions (See appendix at the end of this report for all the questions included in the survey). The questionnaires were distributed to all households of Futaba (About 2,900 households) that receive the regular town mail from Futaba. We also distributed simplified version of the questionnaires excluding already available information in previous rounds of surveys to those who had filled out names and addresses in previous surveys. We received responses from 789 Futaba residents who had evacuated nationwide (416 responses from questionnaires included in the town mail, 373 responses from the simplified version of the questionnaires. Response rate is about 27%).

Figures 1 and 2 show the distribution of age and sex of the respondents. As we can see from these figures, compared to the age and sex distribution reported in the national census, the age distribution of the respondents is left-skewed, with the majority of respondents in their late 60s. The sex distribution shows that the majority of respondents are male. In addition, since the survey was conducted after the tremendous disaster, it is possible that the distributions of the respondents' characteristics are significantly different from those of general questionnaire surveys. Therefore, it should be noted that the results of this survey do not necessarily indicate the general trend of Futaba residents.

 
1 This research has been supported by the following research grants.
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (15 J09313, 26220502, LZ003), Research Grants of the Japan Center for Economic Research.
This study is approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Tokyo (20-244).
 

2――Health conditions

Regarding health condition of the respondents, as shown in Figure 3, many rated their own health condition before the earthquake as "good" or "very good" while many rated their current health status as "bad," "terrible" or "can't say either way". Compared to the 2016 survey result, the portion of respondents who rated their current health stasus as "good" increased in 2019 survey, while the portion of respondents who rated their current health status as "bad" decreased slightly, indicating that overall health status of Futaba residents have been gradually recovering. On the other hand, as shown in Figure 4, when asked about changes in health condition compared to pre-disaster status, many respondents rated their own health condition as worse than that of pre-disaster status and the distribution has hardly changed since 2013.As to mental health, the distribution of K6 score, a clinically varidated index for diagnosing the overall stress state, of Futaba residents gradually improved from 2013 to 2020 (See Figure 5). However, the scores are still higher than those in the other disaster affected areas, indicating that mental health recovery of Futaba may take a very long time. (K6 is an internationally used measurement for general mental health status that consists of six questions. The higher the total score, the more likely the respondent is stressed.)In addition, the previous rounds of surveys between 2013 and 2017 showed that K6 score among Futaba residents living in temporary shelters had been increasing year by year, but only few lived in temporary shelter among respondents of the 2019 and 2020 survey (6 respondents in 2019 and 7 respondents in 2020) since many who used to live in temporary shelters had moved to public reconstruction housings. Therefore, instead of checking the distribution of K6 score among temporary shelter residents, we compare the distribution of K6 score by dwelling type this time. As shown in Figure 6, K6 score among residents of public reconstruction housings tend to be higher than that of residents who live in owned houses. This suggests the importance of continuous mental health support even after leaving from temporary shelters.However, the results of this survey do not necessarily apply to all residents of Futaba, and high K6 score does not necessarily mean that one has a mental disorder. Please note that the purpose of our survey is to provide policy implications.
 

3――Change in social capital

Social capital refers to trusting relationships and networks, and is sometimes referred as "kizuna" in Japanese. Social capital is getting attention as a key notion to achieve successful disaster recovery and has been one of the major focuses of our study. In previous study, we showed social capital would play an important role in maintaining mental health after the disaster, while it might have been weakened by the disaster among Futaba residents.

There are several indicators that are commonly used to measure social capital, but we focus on three items here. First, we check the level of "generalized trust" using GSS trust question, which is one of the most commonly used social capital measures. As shown in Figure 7, generalized trust among Futaba residents had been decreasing from 2013 to 2016 (Portion of those who think people can be trusted had been decreasing). However, since 2017, the portion of those who thinks people can be trusted has been gradually increasing (See Figure 7). The overall distribution is almost same as that of Japan as of 2019. On the other hand, Since Futaba had very high generalized trust level before the disaster, recovery to its original high level would take much longer time.

The second indicator of social capital, "frequency of mutual assistance with neighbors," also shows a gradual recovery trend. In addition, the third indicator of social capital, "trust to neighbors" also shows a gradual recovery trend since 2016, but both trends have been very moderate. It will take a very long time for social capital to recover, and we believe it is important to continue to monitor these changes over the long term.

4――Building relationship with residents at evacuation desitinations

Some of Futaba residents had told us that building a new social relationship with residents in evacuation destinations is an challenge that needs to be addressed under the prolonged evacuation period, in which the policies and understandings of residents in evacuation destinations vary widely. To capture this challenge, since the 2016 survey, the question on the relationship with the residents of the evacuation desitinations have been included. As shown in Figure 10, the percentage of those who feel that it is better to hide that they are from Futaba, those who feel uneasy about taking out garbage, and those who are called bad names or misbehaved because they are from Futaba have been decreasing. On the other hand, the percentage of residents who have opportunities to interact with the residents of the evacuation destinations, those who participate in events held in the evacuation destinations, and those who think it is better to conceal that they are from Futaba have not changed. It shows that about half of the residents wtill do not have opportunities to interact with residents of the evacuation destinations, indicating that building new relationships with residents at the evacuation destinations is still an important challenge for Futaba residents.

5――Summary of the findings from the five rounds of surveys

(1) Futaba residents can be facing more serious psychological distress than those in other disaster affected areas. More than eight years have passed since the Great East Japan Earthquake, and their mental health status have been gradually improving, but recovery may take much longer time.

(2) In particular, there was a possibility that mental health of those who had lived in temporary shelters for long time was in a serious condition. However, currently, even after many of the residents have already moved from temporary shelters to public reconstruction housings, mental health of residents in public reconstruction housings is in a serious condition, and continuous support is necessary.

(3) As to changes in income and health condition caused by the disaster, we find that the greater the extent of decrease or deterioration is, the greater the degree of decline in individual well-being tends to be. This implies the necessity of sufficient compensation to recover the original state of survivors’ well-being.

(4) The disaster has weakened social capital of Futaba residents, and recovery may take very long time.

(5) Keeping in touch with people who had been friends from pre-disaster time and participating in hobbies and volunteer activities after the disaster may help people maintain good mental health.

(6) Though relationship building with the residents of the evacuation destinations show some progress little by little, the progress is subtle and it is still an important challenge evacuees are facing.

(7) Aggravated present bias (procrastination tendency) due to disasters can lead a decline in mental health condition, but policies that promote interaction among residents and encourage good health behaviors can prevent such a decline.
 
These results have been presented in international and domestic academic conferences. Also, these results have been published in international academic journals. Furthermore, a book, Fukushima Nuclear Disaster and Mental Health was published from Nippon hyoron sha in March 2021. We intend to continue our analysis and contribute to improve disaster preparation/rehabilitation policies.
 

Participants of our surveys are approximately 27% of households of Futaba and the results do not represent all Futaba residents. Since the survey was conducted after a major disaster, the characteristics of respondents may be very different from general surveys and there is a possibility of an overestimation in deterioration of health condition in our results. Therefore, we need a special caution in interpreting the results, and any definitive judgments based solely on these findings should be avoided.

【関連レポート】 Damage, Information Acquisition Route, and Reconstruction Under the Great East Japan Earthquake-The 1st Survey of Nuclear Disaster Evacuees from Futaba, Fukushima, Summary of Results 2013
Damage, Living Environment, and Reconstruction Under the Great East Japan Earthquake-The 2nd Survey of Nuclear Disaster Evacuees from Futaba, Fukushima, Summary of Results 2014
Damage, Living Environment, and Reconstruction Under the Great East Japan Earthquake-The 3rd Survey of Nuclear Disaster Evacuees from Futaba, Fukushima, Summary of Results 2016
Damage, Living Environment, and Reconstruction Under the Great East Japan Earthquake-The 4th Survey of Nuclear Disaster Evacuees from Futaba, Fukushima, Summary of Results 2017
Damage, Living Environment, and Reconstruction Under the Great East Japan Earthquake-The 5th Survey of Nuclear Disaster Evacuees from Futaba, Fukushima, Summary of Results 2019

経済レポート

家族計画の変化に見る、新型コロナの少子化への影響(4)-結婚意欲の高まりについて-

■要旨 新型コロナ感染症は少子化にどういった影響を与えるのか。本稿では、ニッセイ基礎研究所が実施した独自のWEBアンケート調査を用いた、コロナ禍での家族計画に関する3つの傾向についての分析(一時的に妊娠を控える傾向、将来的に持ちたい子の数の減少、結婚意欲の高まり)のうち、3つ目として、「結婚意欲の高まり」について、そうした変化があった人の割合と要因、及び、特徴についての分析結果を紹介する。 ■目次 1―― はじめに 2―― 新型コロナ拡大によって...

経済レポート

家族計画の変化に見る、新型コロナの少子化への影響(3)-将来持ちたい子の数の減少について-

■要旨 新型コロナ感染症は少子化にどういった影響を与えるのか。本稿では、ニッセイ基礎研究所が実施した独自のWEBアンケート調査を用いた、コロナ禍での家族計画の変化に関する3つの傾向についての分析(一時的に妊娠を控える傾向、将来的に持ちたい子の数の減少、そして、結婚意欲の高まり)のうち、2つ目として、将来的に持ちたい子の数が減少した人の割合と要因、及び、特徴についての分析結果を紹介する。 ■目次 1―― はじめに 2―― 新型コロナによって中期的に...

経済レポート

家族計画の変化に見る、新型コロナの少子化への影響(2)-一時的に妊娠を控える傾向について-

■要旨 新型コロナ感染症は少子化にどういった影響を与えるのか。本稿では、ニッセイ基礎研究所が実施した独自のWEBアンケート調査を用いた、コロナ禍での家族計画の変化に関する3つの側面についての分析(一時的に妊娠を控える傾向、将来的に持ちたい子の数の減少、そして、結婚意欲の高まり)のうち、1つ目として、新型コロナ拡大によって、一時的に妊娠を控えたいと思った人の割合と要因、及び、特徴についての分析結果を紹介する。 ■目次 1―― はじめに 2―― 一時...

経済レポート

家族計画の変化に見る、新型コロナの少子化への影響(1)-イントロダクション-

■要旨 2020年の妊娠届数は前年比4.8%減少した。これは新型コロナの影響と見られ、2021年の出生数は、国立社会保障・人口問題研究所の推計より大きく減少し、80万人を割る可能性が高まっていることが伝えられている。この出生数の減少は、コロナ禍での一時的なものなのだろうか、それとも将来的な少子化の加速に影響するのだろうか。もし将来的な少子化の加速に影響するとすれば、どの程度の影響が予想されるのか。また、出産につながる重要なライフコースとしての結婚への意識は、コ...

経済レポート

コロナ禍における生活の変化(4)-「新型コロナによる暮らしの変化に関する調査」からみる生活不安の変化と地域間較差

■要旨 生活実態と生活時間の変化について地域別に分析した結果を示した前稿に続き、各調査時点である6月末、9月末および収束後の生活に対する不安として、感染不安、経済不安、働き方不安、家族関係不安と人間関係不安、行動不安のそれぞれについて、地域ごとに各時点の状況および時点間の変化を概観した。 その結果、いずれの局面における不安についても、各調査時点である昨年の9月、12月、今年3月の3時点間ではそれぞれ様々に変化している上、地域によってもそれぞれ異なっている...

経済レポート

えひめ結婚支援センターにおけるイベント成婚「年の差」分析結果-「年の差婚」の正しい認識が成功のカギ-

■要旨 東京圏への20代人口を中心とした男女アンバランスな人口集中が10年以上続く中、転出超過エリアにおける未婚化問題の深刻化が予想される。   愛媛県の自治体型結婚支援センターは、47都道府県で21番目に設立されたセンターであるものの、愛媛県法人会連合会が「未婚化がもたらす企業の黒字倒産問題を解決する」という目標を活動の柱の1つとして運営する全国でも珍しい運営目標をあわせもつセンターである。このため設立以来、イベント開催やAIを搭載したマッチン...

経済レポート

コロナ禍における少子化対策-行動経済学から考えるネット型マッチングサービスにおける3 つの意思決定先送り要因

日本において少子化が進行した主な要因は、非婚化・晩婚化である。しかし、今も昔と変わらず、独身者の多くは結婚願望を持っている。国立社会保障・人口問題研究所「出生動向基本調査」によると、「いずれ結婚するつもり」との回答は依然として85%を超えており、高水準を維持している。独身にとどまっている理由では、「適当な相手に巡り合わない」との回答が男女ともに5割程度存在しており、マッチングの効率化が、少子化対策に有効であると考えられる。   婚活におけるパートナー探...

経済レポート

行動経済学から見たネット型マッチングサービスの課題と期待~コロナ禍における少子化対策として~

日本は出生数の低下が継続し、先進国で最も少子化が進んでいる国の一つだ。人口が急激に減少すると、経済規模が縮小するとともに、社会保障制度は持続可能性が脅かされ、基礎自治体は消滅へと繋がる。政府は、骨太方針2019において、人口減少のスピードを緩和するために、結婚支援、通勤時間の短縮やテレワークの推進、放課後児童クラブの受け皿整備、不妊治療への支援などの様々な政策により、希望出生率1.8の実現を目指すとしている。 少子化の度合いを測る代表的な指標としての合計特殊出...